By JC, Editor · TypeFury · Last updated 2026-03-30
Why your keys are in that order — and why they'll probably stay that way
← Back to TypeFuryThe QWERTY layout — named for the first six letters on the top row — was designed by Christopher Latham Sholes, the inventor of the first commercially successful typewriter. Sholes patented his typewriter in 1868 and spent the next five years refining the keyboard layout, ultimately arriving at the arrangement we still use today.
The popular myth is that Sholes designed QWERTY to intentionally slow typists down, preventing the mechanical type bars from jamming. The reality is more nuanced. Early typewriters used a system of type bars that would swing up to strike the paper through an ink ribbon. If two adjacent type bars were struck in quick succession, they could collide and jam. Sholes's layout separated commonly paired letters (like S-T, H-E) to reduce — but not eliminate — this jamming problem.
However, slowing typists down was not the primary goal. The layout was also influenced by telegraph operators who were among the first professional typists. Some letter placements reflect the operators' need to quickly transcribe Morse code, where certain letter combinations occur frequently.
In 1873, Sholes sold his typewriter patent to the Remington Arms Company — yes, the gun manufacturer. Remington, looking for new products after Civil War demand declined, began mass-producing the Sholes & Glidden Type-Writer in 1874. The QWERTY layout came along for the ride.
Remington's dominance in the typewriter market meant that QWERTY became the de facto standard. As typing schools opened across the United States in the 1880s, they taught QWERTY because that's what Remington sold. As more people learned QWERTY, more typewriter manufacturers adopted it to remain compatible. By the 1890s, QWERTY had achieved what economists call "lock-in" — the standard was so widely adopted that switching to anything else became impractical.
This is one of history's most powerful examples of path dependency: we use QWERTY in 2026 not because it's the best possible layout, but because it was the first layout to achieve critical mass in the 1880s.
In 1936, Dr. August Dvorak and his brother-in-law Dr. William Dealey patented the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard, designed from the ground up for speed and efficiency. Unlike Sholes, who was constrained by mechanical limitations, Dvorak used frequency analysis of the English language to create a layout that minimized finger movement.
The Dvorak layout places the most common letters on the home row (A, O, E, U, I, D, H, T, N, S), meaning about 70% of English text can be typed without leaving the home position — compared to only 32% on QWERTY. Vowels are on the left, common consonants on the right, encouraging efficient hand alternation.
Dvorak claimed speed improvements of 35-40% and reduced finger travel distance by up to 60%. Studies have produced mixed results — some showing significant speed gains, others showing minimal difference once proficiency is reached on either layout. What is generally agreed upon is that Dvorak is more comfortable for extended typing sessions due to the reduced finger movement.
So why didn't Dvorak win? Lock-in. By 1936, millions of typists had trained on QWERTY, millions of typewriters were QWERTY, and the cost of retraining an entire workforce was astronomical. The same barrier exists today — even though every modern operating system supports Dvorak, QWERTY's installed base is simply too large to displace.
Created by Shai Coleman, Colemak was designed as a modern alternative that's easier to transition to from QWERTY. It changes only 17 keys from the standard layout, preserving many QWERTY shortcuts and reducing the learning curve. Colemak places the ten most common English letters on the home row and has gained a devoted following among programmers and typing enthusiasts.
Designed by OJ Bucao specifically to address ergonomic concerns, Workman layouts reduce lateral finger stretching and prioritize comfortable finger movements based on the natural biomechanics of human hands. It's popular in the mechanical keyboard community.
France's standard keyboard layout, AZERTY swaps several keys from QWERTY to accommodate French language patterns (accented characters, the frequency of A versus Q). It demonstrates that QWERTY was never a universal solution — different languages have different needs.
Used in Germany and Central Europe, QWERTZ swaps Y and Z (since Z is much more common in German than Y) and rearranges some punctuation to accommodate umlauts and other German-specific characters.
When personal computers arrived in the 1970s and 80s, there was a brief window where the computing industry could have adopted a different layout. The mechanical jamming problem that partially inspired QWERTY was completely irrelevant on electronic keyboards. But inertia won: IBM's Model M keyboard (1984) used QWERTY, and every computer keyboard since has followed.
The smartphone era presented another opportunity for change. Touchscreens have no physical keys — the layout could be anything. Yet the virtual QWERTY keyboard prevailed because billions of people already knew where the letters were. Even swipe-typing and predictive text, which fundamentally change how we interact with letters, are built on the QWERTY arrangement.
Voice input and AI writing tools may eventually reduce our dependence on keyboard layouts altogether. But for now, the layout that Christopher Sholes designed for a mechanical typewriter in 1873 remains the dominant interface between human thought and digital text — 150 years and counting.
If you're already proficient at QWERTY (60+ WPM), switching to Dvorak or Colemak is unlikely to make you dramatically faster. The research shows that individual practice and technique matter far more than layout choice. The fastest typists in the world use QWERTY.
That said, if you experience discomfort during extended typing, an alternative layout might reduce strain due to less finger travel. And if you're just starting to learn touch typing, you have a genuine choice — there's no sunk cost to overcome.
For most people, improving their QWERTY technique (see our how to type faster guide) will produce bigger gains than switching layouts. But if you're curious, most operating systems let you switch layouts with a simple settings change — no hardware required.
Whatever layout you use, TypeFury helps you practice and improve. Free speed tests, structured lessons, and progress tracking — no sign-up required.
START TYPING →